Sharon_MustExposeCourtCommittments

When Government is the Lawbreaker it breeds contempt for Law Condense to the Major Issues: for Script


Mon.30thApr.2012

Affiant Sharon Anderson Maiden Name Peterson_Chergosky 1st Husband Scarrella

Pursuant to Penalitys of Perjury Script4 http://www.lawlessamerica.com/

on the Graves of he Parents Bill and Bernice Peterson ie: Tenants in Common.

To Any and all 700 Victims coming forth

"at risk" Civil,Criminal Complaints against State and Federal MN Judges

"Takings" of Family 1966, by Decedant Judge Lynch

Vonessa Anna Maria Scarrella_Heritage - YouTube



► 3:20► 3:20 www.youtube.com/watch?v=UknPKrRXzAY

Takings of Realestate from 1973 up to and including the present

Scarrella vs. Midwes Fed S&L wihout Probate's or Quiet Titles.

536 F.2d 1207

bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/536/536.F2d.1207.75-1912.htmlCached

by Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit - 1976 - Cited by 77 - Related articles

536 F.2d 1207. Rev. Sharon L. SCARRELLA et al., Appellants, v. MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN et al., A

1974 Taking the Right to run for the Jobs of Judge In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d562 because Sharon et al did not have a Law License http://www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com/
http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonandersonbernicepeterson821292taxfight
1982 Tax Court Denied Due Process 1984 Impeachment of numerous Judges. Wrongful Death Bernice A. Peterson http://www.crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com/
 http://www.scribd.com/documents
1984 May 1st "Tenant in Common"
1988 Lesbian Judge Kathleen Gearin exploited Sharon and Disabled Husband to Take our Homestead at 1058 Summit Ave. St.Paul,MN
Forcing us to live in a Tar Paper Shack. contrary to ADA,Banking Regulations, State and Federal Laws.

1989 Wrongful Death of William O.Peterson http://www.petersonfamilytree.blogspot.com/ Tenant in Common.

1992 Sharon purchased 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul for 5 thous. running for St.Paul Mayor vs. Norm Coleman the 3rd and Maria Blast which 6 persons Died re: Judge Kathleen Gearin.

1994 Sharon the Republican Candidate for MN Attorney General.

1997 Sharons 2nd Husband Silver Star Cpl Jim Anderson went on a

Drunkard Rampage, playing into the Hands of the Corrupt Courts

ie: Judges John Hawkinson, Lois Lange, Jon Maturi,
Sharon ended up in he State Mental Institution for 94 days, forced "Depokate" a Dangerous Drug for Elepisy, false Medical Records, Divorce Papers served MN Commitment Panel Lesbian Judge Kathleen Gearin_Joane Smith,Alberta Miera ie: Judge Gregg Johnson and his Wife County Commissioner at that time Susan Haigh. Judge Salvador Rosas etc. currently Judge John Vandenorth, Retired Black Judge Edward Toussaint, False Orders stating property Abondoned, when Homestead. 94 thousand Dollars unaccounted for by Ramsey Co. Officials. Major Ponzi Schemes in the State Commitment Process

Subsequently Jim Anderson was committed for 1 year at Brainard and was Murdered 21Sept2000.

2000 to 2012 Sharon runs for Public Office Filings July2012 in MN.

2005 Sharon went Blind in the Ramsey Co.Jail, Denied Medical Care.

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/773-2007-02-27T034310Z/AG
The Reprisals are Heinous.......... Corrupt Cops stalking the citizenery

taking Water,Cars,Trailers personal property re: Metro Gang Strike Force. Dirty Cops stalking Sharon causing Fractured Ankle 2005

Water Shut Off 2006 http://www.sharon4anderson.org/  2007 Theft of Car,Trailer,Personal Property.

2008 Property Taxes paid US Bank with Constitutional Challenge of the Excessive,Burdensome,Arbitrary Fees,Excussive Consumption,Row Duplicate triggering Tax Forfeiture of 697 Surrey 2013. unabated by Government Officials.

THEREFORE AFFIANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO GO SLOW

TO AVOID REPRISALS.. Ponzi Schemes in St. Paul must be exposed.

Sharons Propertys unabated by Government Officials

Taken in a Ponzi Schemes 1058 Summit Ave,Homestead,325 N.Wilder 6 unit,448Desnoyer Duplex,2194 Marshall duplex, currently 697 Surrey in Tax Forclosure 2013 via Death,Disability,Disparagement of Titles Theft of Car,Water,etc. 2 Cabins http://www.sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com/
denied now over 10 years by Corrupt Judges Solien, et al http://www.sharonvbarbarmstrong.blogspot.com/

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT BE

Sharon went Blind in the Ramsey Co. Jail Denied Medical Care Corrupt Judges Solien et al.J






Yes the Pic Proves the Corruption of the Minnesota Court System and to covertly coverup
Attorney Pro Se_Private AG and Whistleblowers Valid Complants of Government Abuse.
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1500-2007-05-11T163654Z/AitkinAns0332_27.pd

In a message dated 4/29/2012 5:32:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time, veleynna@yahoo.com writes

Document 77 :: Garcia et al v. Metro Gang Strike Force et al :: 0:2009cv01996 :: Minnesota District Court :: US Federal District Courts Cases :: Justia

Document 77 :: Garcia et al v. Metro Gang Strike Force et al :: 0:2009cv01996 :: Minnesota District Court :: US Federal District Courts Cases :: Justia

JURIST - Paper Chase: Obama administration clears path for Supreme Court to rule on health care mandate

JURIST - Paper Chase: Obama administration clears path for Supreme Court to rule on health care mandate

PAPER CHASE NEWSBURST Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.

PAPER CHASE NEWSBURST Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 Obama administration clears path for Supreme Court to rule on health care mandate Alexandra Malatesta at 10:37 AM ET [JURIST] The Obama administration on Monday declined to seek en banc review by the full US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit [official websites] of its August decision striking down the individual mandate provision [JURIST report] of the health care reform law [JURIST backgrounder], clearing the path for an appeal to the US Supreme Court [official website]. The decision could mean that the Supreme Court will hear the case during its 2011 term and that a ruling could come as early as June. The court is expected to agree to hear the case because there is a circuit split on the issue. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit [official website] upheld the law in June, and that ruling was appealed [JURIST reports] to the Supreme Court by the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) [advocacy website]. JURIST Guest Columnist Steven Schwinn of the John Marshall Law School in Chicago recently argued that the Eleventh Circuit ignored the text, history and jurisprudence of the Constitution in its recent health care ruling, which will likely not be adopted by the Supreme Court [JURIST op-ed] given recent rulings on congressional Commerce Clause authority. Other courts have also weighed in on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision. Earlier this month, a judge for the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania [official website] ruled that the individual mandate is unconstitutional [JURIST report]. Also in September, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit [official website] dismissed two lawsuits [JURIST report] challenging the mandate's constitutionality. In Virginia v. Sebelius, the court held that Virginia lacked standing to sue and vacated the judgment of the district court [JURIST report], remanding the case with instructions to dismiss the suit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. In Liberty University v. Geithner, the court ruled that the suit was filed prematurely, also vacating the lower court ruling [JURIST report], which had declared the act constitutional.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 Obama administration clears path for Supreme Court to rule on health care mandate Alexandra Malatesta at 10:37 AM ET [JURIST] The Obama administration on Monday declined to seek en banc review by the full US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit [official websites] of its August decision striking down the individual mandate provision [JURIST report] of the health care reform law [JURIST backgrounder], clearing the path for an appeal to the US Supreme Court [official website]. The decision could mean that the Supreme Court will hear the case during its 2011 term and that a ruling could come as early as June. The court is expected to agree to hear the case because there is a circuit split on the issue. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit [official website] upheld the law in June, and that ruling was appealed [JURIST reports] to the Supreme Court by the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) [advocacy website]. JURIST Guest Columnist Steven Schwinn of the John Marshall Law School in Chicago recently argued that the Eleventh Circuit ignored the text, history and jurisprudence of the Constitution in its recent health care ruling, which will likely not be adopted by the Supreme Court [JURIST op-ed] given recent rulings on congressional Commerce Clause authority. Other courts have also weighed in on the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision. Earlier this month, a judge for the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania [official website] ruled that the individual mandate is unconstitutional [JURIST report]. Also in September, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit [official website] dismissed two lawsuits [JURIST report] challenging the mandate's constitutionality. In Virginia v. Sebelius, the court held that Virginia lacked standing to sue and vacated the judgment of the district court [JURIST report], remanding the case with instructions to dismiss the suit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. In Liberty University v. Geithner, the court ruled that the suit was filed prematurely, also vacating the lower court ruling [JURIST report], which had declared the act constitutional.

Bill Windsor_Dr.Zernik Affidavits_CorruptionUSCourts

Affidavit provided in support of William Windsor’s Atlanta Grand Jury testimony regarding corruption of the US courts
Affidavit provided in support of William Windsor’s Atlanta Grand Jury testimony regarding corruption of the US courts

Dr Zernik’s affidavit opined fraud by the US courts in the Northern District of Georgia and the District of Columbia in cases involving William Windsor. Widespread fraud and corruption is enabled through PACER and CM/ECF, the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts.


Dr Zernik’s affidavit opined fraud by the US courts in the Northern District of Georgia and the District of Columbia in cases involving William Windsor. Widespread fraud and corruption is enabled through PACER and CM/ECF, the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts.

WilliamWindsor_GrandJury_JudicialTryanny

Affidavit provided in support of William Windsor’s Atlanta Grand Jury testimony regarding corruption of the US courts

Dr Zernik’s affidavit opined fraud by the US courts in the Northern District of Georgia and the District of Columbia in cases involving William Windsor. Widespread fraud and corruption is enabled through PACER and CM/ECF, the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts.

William Windsor

Los Angeles, August 18 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), filed an affidavit in support of the testimony of Mr William Windsor before a Federal Grand Jury in Atlanta, Georgia, pertaining to corruption of the US courts. [[i]]

Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience over the past decade in examining electronic records of the California and US courts:

• A report, which he authored, was reviewed by the professional staff of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States. The report was incorporated into the official UPR Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”. [[ii]]
  
  
• A scholarly paper, which he authored on the subject of fraud in the electronic records of the US courts, was peer-reviewed and published in a computer science journal with an editorial board listing scholars from six (6) European nations and Canada. [[iii]]
  
  
• An abstract on the subject of fraud in the electronic records of the US courts, which he authored, was peer-reviewed and published by the 16th World Criminology Congress.
  
  
• The same papers were peer-reviewed and selected for presentations in an international computer science conference in Europe and the 16th World Criminology Congress in Japan. [[iv]]
  
  
• His opinions in such matters were also re-affirmed by opinion letters of well-recognized fraud experts and a computer science scholar, including, but not limited to:
  
  
  
  
  
  • James Wedick, an FBI-veteran, who was decorated by the US Congress, by FBI Director, and by US Attorney General for his achievements in law enforcement, [[v]] and
    
    
  • Professor Eliyahu Shamir, a well-recognized computer science expert, who made seminal contributions to computer science in the field of language analysis (co-author of the “Pumping Lemma”). [[vi]]

In his affidavit, Dr Zernik opined regarding the records in two specific cases involving Mr Windsor:

• Maid of the Mist Corporation et al v Alcatraz Media, LLC, et al (1:09-Cv-01543) in the US Court, Northern District of Georgia. [[vii]]
  
  
• Windsor v Evans et al (1:10-cv-00197) in the US Court, District of Columbia. [[viii]]

In both cases, Dr Zernik opined fraud by the respective US district courts on Mr Windsor.
The nature of the fraud was the conduct of simulated litigation. [[ix]]

Dr Zernik further opined that PACER (the electronic system for public access to court electronic records) and CM/ECF (the electronic system for case management and electronic case filing), which were implemented by the Administrative Office of the US Courts, enable the routine conduct of simulated litigation of cases before the US courts from coast to coast.

In previous publications, Dr Zernik opined that the introduction of such fraudulent electronic records systems in the US courts undermines Human Rights and banking regulation, and that corruption of the US courts was tightly linked to the current economic crisis. [[x]]

LINKS

[i] 11-08-18 Affidavit of Joseph Zernik in support of William Windsor's testimony before a Georgia Grand Jury regarding corruption of the US courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62589967/
[ii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[iii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[iv] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351562/
[v] 07-12-17 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) David Pasternak: Grant Deeds in re: 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, opined as fraud by James Wedick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24991238/
[vi] 09-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir's Opinion Letter re: Sustain - the Case Management System of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46069337/
09-04-20 Prof Eli Shamir, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, directory information
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30454039/
[vii] 11-05-12 PRESS RELEASE: Maid of the Mist Corporation Et Al v Alcatraz Media, LLC, Et Al (1-09-Cv-01543) Simulated Litigation - Fraud in the US Court, Northern District of Georgia
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55272776/
[viii] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court,DC – master of the “Leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/
[ix] Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[x] 11-08-08 PRESS RELEASE: Fraud and Corruption in the US Courts are Tightly Linked to Failing Banking Regulation and the Global Economic Crisis – presentation in the 16th World Criminology Congress, Japan
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62153608/
______
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______

Flag Counter: 125
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 541,060
Followers: 928
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 449,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue
CNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006 That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013
Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/

Supreme Court Urged to Review Ruling that Shields Corporations from Human Rights Suits | Common Dreams

Supreme Court Urged to Review Ruling that Shields Corporations from Human Rights Suits Common Dreams

Thank God For The Renegades